In application development it’s always important not leaving any details behind, that´s why we will focus today on analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of each of the classes that the Java ecosystem has to handle and manipulating Strings.
String
In Java the String object is immutable, this means that once you create it, it cannot be changed (ie: if we contact two Strings we are creating two separate String in a Heap and the garbage collector must release all the instances (fragments) we used to create the final String).
_String salute = “Hi ” + ” my ” + ” name ” + “ is ”; _Also, it’s important to emphasize that all the Strings we create without using a “new”, are stored in a pool of strings which is part of the Heap.
StringBuilder
StringBuilder is mutable and when you concatenate several Strings these are created in a Heap and not in the **pool of strings **saving the JVM (Java Virtual Machine) memory and reducing garbage collection time, for that reason it’s a good way to use and manipulate Strings.
StringBuffer
StringBuffer has the same functionality of the StringBuilder with the difference that all the methods of the StringBuffer are synchronized allowing them to be thread-safe. They should be considered for distributed environments or for situations where more than one Thread needs to manipulate the same strings.
StringBuilder salute = new StringBuilder(“Hi ”).append(“ my ”).append.(” name ”).append(“ is ”);Note that we use the “same reference” of memory.
Comparison
| Comparison | String | StringBuilder | StringBuffer |
|---|---|---|---|
Immutable | Yes | No | No |
Performance | Fast | Fast | Slow |
Thread Safe | Yes | No | Yes |
Store | String Pool | Heap | Heap |
Performance of String concatenation
We tested this sample code 10 times to see how it behaves from the memory perspective and how much time it takes to each one of the 3 classes to execute it. You can download the source code from this repository: https://github.com/erendontech/performance-string-comparison.git
Public class PerformanceStringComparison {
private static final int MEGA_BYTES = 10241024;
private static final int TIMES = 9999;
public static void main(String args[]){
PerformanceStringComparison msg = new
PerformanceStringComparison();
msg.concatMultipleString(TIMES);
msg.concatMultipleStringBuilder(TIMES);
msg.concatMultipleStringBuffer(TIMES);
}
public void concatMultipleString(long _limit){
System.out.println("Init concatMultipleString");
System.gc();
long start, end;
start = System.currentTimeMillis();
String message = new String();
for(int i = 0; i <= _limit; i++){
message = message + "Performance " + i;
if(i == _limit){
Runtime rt = Runtime.getRuntime();
long usedMB = (rt.totalMemory()/MEGA_BYTES - rt.freeMemory()/MEGA_BYTES);
System.out.println(String.format("Memory usage: %s", usedMB));
}
}
end = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println(String.format("Time String %s milliseconds
", (end-start)));
}
public void concatMultipleStringBuilder(long _limit){
System.out.println("Init concatMultipleStringBuilder");
System.gc();
long start, end;
start = System.currentTimeMillis();
StringBuilder message = new StringBuilder();
for(int i = 0; i <= _limit; i++){
message.append("Performance ").append(i);
if(i == _limit){
Runtime rt = Runtime.getRuntime();
long usedMB = (rt.totalMemory() - rt.freeMemory()) / 1024 / 1024;
System.out.println(String.format("Memory usage: %s", usedMB));
}
}
end = System.currentTimeMillis()
System.out.println(String.format("Time StringBuilder %s milliseconds
", (end-start)));
}
public void concatMultipleStringBuffer(long _limit){
System.out.println("Init concatMultipleStringBuffer");
System.gc();
long start, end;
start = System.currentTimeMillis();
StringBuffer message = new StringBuffer();
for(int i = 0; i <= _limit; i++){
message.append("Performance ").append(i);
if(i == _limit){
Runtime rt = Runtime.getRuntime();
long usedMB = (rt.totalMemory() - rt.freeMemory()) / 1024 / 1024;
System.out.println(String.format("Memory usage: %s", usedMB));
}
}
end = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println(String.format("Time StringBuffer %s milliseconds", (end-start)));
}
}
Avg (ms) | Avg(memory user MB) | |
|---|---|---|
String | 1116.5 | 31.4 |
StringBuilder | 1.3 | 1 |
StringBuffer Safe | 2.9 | 1 |
These results don’t necessarily mean that a class is better than the other; it just means that depending on the application you’re developing, the problem that you’re resolving and the environment/architecture where the application will run, you should choose the option that better fits your needs.
